An interesting article from Cool News talks about the differences in dog brains vs cats and even rats. I think it may also be impacted by other senses such as sense of smell when it comes to locating food sources but the differences in the way the brain enable retention, even in animals, corroborates our brain synchrony findings.
The genius of dogs is in their relationship with humans, write Brian Hare and Vanessa Woods, authors of The Genius of Dogs, in The Wall Street Journal. While other language-trained animals can "learn to respond to
dozens of spoken signals associated with different objects," dogs are
the only animals that have demonstrated an ability to learn the names of
objects the same way humans do. A 2004 experiment by Juliane Kaminski
of University of Portsmouth in Britain, involved a dog named Rico, who
could infer the name of a new toy simply because the name was different
from that of the toys he already knew, just like a human.
Dogs have only "half as many neurons in their cerebral cortex as
cats," but apparently have better memories. "Several years ago, Sylvain
Fiset of Canada's University of Moncton and colleagues reported
experiments in which a dog or cat watched while a researcher hid a
reward in one of four boxes. After a delay, they were allowed to search
for a treat. Cats started guessing after only one minute. But even after
four minutes, dogs hadn't forgotten where they saw the food." Okay, so
maybe the cats are just too smart to be bothered with "playing our
silly games."
Dogs are not as bright when it comes to "navigational memory." Rats --
not cats this time -- performed better at finding food through a maze.
In a contest against wolves, dogs were not as adept at figuring out how
to get at food "placed on the opposite side of a fence, as shown by a
study by Harry and Martha Frank of the University of Michigan." However,
a later study out of Hungary found that dogs solved the problem
immediately after observing "a human rounding the fence first,"
suggesting that "the secret of the genius of dogs" is when they "join
forces with us."
Our Brains Can't Chew Popcorn and Listen At The Same Time
One of the conclusions we reached in our brain synchrony work is that when different parts of the brain (sound, text, patterns, colors, movement, for example) are stimulated at the same time from the same stimuli, that helps us retain messages. So when scientists found that chewing while listening disrupts comprehension, we were not surprised.
According to Bloomberg Businessweek (10/28/13) and as reported by Cool News, researchers at the University of Cologne conducted a test where half the subjects were given a sugar cube during the pre-movie commercials, while the other half was given popcorn. A week later, all of the subjects were exposed to images of the advertised products and the "sugar-cube moviegoers had a clear preference" for them "while the popcorn eaters didn’t. In other words, the ads hadn’t stuck with them
According to Bloomberg Businessweek (10/28/13) and as reported by Cool News, researchers at the University of Cologne conducted a test where half the subjects were given a sugar cube during the pre-movie commercials, while the other half was given popcorn. A week later, all of the subjects were exposed to images of the advertised products and the "sugar-cube moviegoers had a clear preference" for them "while the popcorn eaters didn’t. In other words, the ads hadn’t stuck with them
The result had nothing to do
with popcorn, per se. The reason is that when people read or hear
something, "the brain simulates the corresponding muscle movement of the
throat and mouth … Chewing, however, disrupts the process by
monopolizing the speech muscles (unlike eating a sugar cube, which
dissolves on its own), effectively drowning out any subvocalization and,
with it, the process of familiarization."
An earlier study produced a
similar result when subjects were chewing gum (or not). The research
undermines conventional wisdom that "mere exposure" to an image or
message "predisposes people to liking it." It also "has ramifications"
beyond advertising, as "there are plenty of settings in which people are
trying to absorb new information while eating – the working breakfast,
the client dinner, the lunch consumed resentfully at one’s desk while
trying to catch up on e-mail. Those might all be occasions in which
we’re not taking in information as easily as calories."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)